ABSTRACT
The effect of bathing with carbonated (CO<sub>2</sub>) water by condensing direct heat exchange type heater (CONDEC, Osaka Gas, Co., Ltd.) on tissue perfusion in rabbits was evaluated experimentally by means of mass spectrometry.<br>CONDEC supplies CO<sub>2</sub> water at 100-150ppm at 40-60°C by a latent heat collecting system in which the combustion gas directly contacts the running water.<br>Mean pH of the water in the bath decreased 15%, mean pH of the subcutaneous tissue decreased 1%, and mean pO<sub>2</sub> and pCO<sub>2</sub> in the subcutaneous tissue increased 7% in comparison to values obtained when tap water was used.<br>Mean tissue prefusion rate was calculated to be 21.71±2.34ml/100g/min (n=11, p<0.05), 15% higer than obtained when tap water was used (18.81±2.96, n=9).<br>CONDEC CO<sub>2</sub> water is thought to be useful for hydrotherapy and for application in health promoting facilities in promoting the tissue perfusion, which is known to lead to recovery from fatigue and chronic pain.
ABSTRACT
We previously found experimentally that the subcutaneous tissue perfusion rate was increased by about 16% upon inhalation of high concentration radon (13, 764-23, 743Bq/l).<br>To clarify the effect of a lower concentration of radon water by mass spectrometry, the subcutaneous tissue perfusion rate was determined experimentally in rabbits using fourth-day radon water of a 3, 519-6, 710Bq/l concentration taken from a mineral spring.<br>The subcutaneous tissue perfusion rate with inhalation of the radon water was 15.81±3.10ml/100g/min (mean±SD, n=10), which was similar to that with inhalation with physiological saline solution (15.96±3.09ml/1008/min, n=16). However, the subcutaneous tissue perfusion rate with inhalation of more highly concentrated, first-day, radon water (8, 641-17, 366Bq/l) was 20.76±3.58ml/100g/min (n=16), being significantly higher (p<0.01) than that with water at lower radon concentration.<br>Further studies are needed on the effect of radon water in relation to the hormesis with low dose of radiation.
ABSTRACT
The warming effect following serial bathing in the water containing Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub> was studied in rabbits by mass spectrometry.<br>Rabbits, weighing about 2kg, were placed in a bath containing Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (33g/20l) at 36-37°C for 20 minutes every day for 3 weeks.<br>By mass spectrometry, the subcutaneous tissue perfusion rate was calculated on the basis of changes in the partial pressure of Argon injected on diffusion membrane of the sensor catheter.<br>The mean subcutaneous pCO<sub>2</sub> was 46.6±14.6mmHg in the Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub> bath group and 28.8±6.7mmHg in the control tap water group; the tissue perfusion rate in these two groups was 26.78±6.45ml/100g/min and 20.32±7.15ml/100g/min, respectively.<br>The warming effect of Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub> bathing is thought to be derived from increased metabolism and micro-circulation dynamics resulting from dermal stimulation by Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub>.
ABSTRACT
The warming effect of alkaline saline springs is thought to be caused by the presence of Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub>. To clarify the warming effect of alkaline saline springs, an experimental study was carried out using 5 adult rabbits for each 36-37°C bath every day for 20 minutes without anesthesia, on the assumption that cells in the skin tissue were activated to produce histamine by chemical stimulation. The chemical composition of each artificial salt bath was 4 times higher than normal. Skin histamine was measured by fluorescence analysis.<br>Single bathing in each artificial salt bath had no significant effect on the skin histamine contents. However, the skin histamine contents after a serial bathing in Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>·NaHCO<sub>3</sub> (p<0.01) and CO<sub>2</sub> baths (p<0.05) for 3 weeks were significantly increased compared with that of tap water.<br>The small amount of histamine released as a chemical mediator may have caused the warming effect, as observed in type 1 allergic reaction.